The Paragon Framework

The Paragon Framework

Four pillars.
One coordinated architecture.

A deeper look for professionals and investors who want to understand the full framework

Each pillar addresses a distinct capital pocket and a specific tax exposure. The real power is not in any single structure—it is in how they work together, sequenced and coordinated from the first conversation. This page is designed for CPAs, attorneys, real estate professionals, and investors who want to understand exactly how each pillar works and where it fits within the whole.

01

Real Estate Capital Events

Tax-Deferred Real Estate Exits—1031 / DST / 721

02

Non-RE Capital Gains Events

Qualified Opportunity Zones

03

Daily Liquid AUM

Evidence-Based Liquid Portfolio

04

Private Capital & Insurance

Non-Correlated & Tax-Advantaged Compounding

01

Real Estate Capital Events

Tax-Deferred Real Estate Exits

If you are selling real estate, taxes will likely become the single largest factor in your outcome. Handled correctly, they can be deferred, managed, and in some cases eliminated. Handled poorly, they can permanently reduce what you keep. The structure you choose at the point of sale materially impacts your tax liability and your long-term trajectory—and that decision window is narrow.

In practice

“The challenge most investors face is not understanding the rule—it is executing it effectively within the IRS timeline while achieving the right structure for long-term outcomes.”

45 days

Identification window from closing to replacement property selection

180 days

Total window to complete the exchange and close on replacement

$9.1M

Actual client exchange—restructured across DST, private RE, and 721

$0

Capital gains recognized at time of sale in the case study below

The 1031 Exchange—Foundation of RE Tax Deferral

A 1031 exchange allows you to defer capital gains taxes by reinvesting proceeds into like-kind real estate. The mechanics are well-established under IRC Section 1031—but execution within the IRS timeline is where most investors encounter difficulty. The 45-day identification window and 180-day closing window are unforgiving, and a missed deadline means the full gain becomes immediately taxable.

The challenge for most high-net-worth investors is not the 1031 concept—it is finding a replacement property that satisfies the equity and debt requirements, meets institutional quality standards, and closes within the window. This is precisely the problem that Delaware Statutory Trusts solve.

Technical Definition—For CPAs and Legal Professionals

A Delaware Statutory Trust is a legally distinct entity created under Delaware statutory law (12 Del. C. § 3801 et seq.) that holds title to real property. For federal income tax purposes, the IRS treats beneficial interests in a DST as a direct interest in the underlying real property—not as a security or partnership interest—based on Revenue Ruling 2004-86. This ruling is the foundation that allows DST interests to qualify as like-kind replacement property in a 1031 exchange. The investor holds a beneficial interest in the trust, which holds direct title to the asset. That beneficial interest is what satisfies the 1031 direct ownership requirement—making the DST the only securitized real estate structure that qualifies for exchange treatment under current IRS guidance.

Delaware Statutory Trust

What a DST Is

A DST allows you to acquire a fractional ownership interest in institutional-quality real estate that qualifies as direct ownership for 1031 purposes. Instead of purchasing an entire replacement property, you acquire a proportional interest in a professionally managed asset—multifamily, industrial, medical office, net lease—at institutional scale.

DST Advantages for the 1031 Investor

Why DSTs Solve the Execution Problem

Precision matching: Equity and debt requirements can be met precisely across multiple DST positions—no excess equity sitting idle, no shortfall triggering partial gain recognition


Immediate diversification: Depending on the equity of the property sale, a single exchange can deploy across multiple DST properties in different markets, asset classes, and risk profiles—diversification that a single replacement property cannot achieve


Management elimination: The investor transitions from active operator to passive beneficial owner—no tenants, no maintenance, no personal liability


Timeline certainty: DST offerings are pre-structured and ready to close—critical when the 180-day window is running


Non-recourse debt: Debt within the DST satisfies the replacement debt requirement without personal guarantee obligations

The 721 UPREIT—Adding Long-Term Flexibility

For investors looking beyond a traditional 1031 into direct replacement property, the 721 UPREIT structure provides a different dimension. Real estate—including interests held in DSTs—can be contributed into an Operating Partnership in exchange for OP units, allowing further diversification and deferral without triggering a taxable event.

Technical Definition—For CPAs and Legal Professionals

A 721 exchange—under IRC Section 721—allows a property owner, including the holder of a DST beneficial interest, to contribute that interest into a Real Estate Operating Partnership in exchange for OP units without triggering a taxable event. Unlike a 1031 exchange, which preserves a direct real property interest, a 721 contribution converts that interest into a partnership stake in a diversified, institutionally managed portfolio. OP units are not publicly traded but typically carry a conversion right to REIT shares after a defined holding period—introducing a liquidity path a DST cannot provide. The deferred gain carries over as basis in the OP units and is not recognized until a taxable disposition. Under current law, OP units may receive a stepped-up basis at death—potentially eliminating the deferred gain entirely for heirs.

Where a 1031 into a DST preserves your real property interest and depreciation characteristics, a 721 into an OP converts that interest into a partnership stake in a diversified institutional portfolio — deferring the same gain, eliminating the management burden, and introducing a future liquidity path the DST cannot provide.

721 UPREIT Creates

Continued Tax Deferral

The contribution of property or DST interests into an OP is a non-taxable exchange. Gain continues to be deferred — with carryover basis preserved and the timing of future recognition within the investor’s control.

721 UPREIT Creates

Diversified RE Portfolio Access

OP units represent an interest in a diversified, institutionally managed real estate portfolio—typically REIT-quality assets across multiple markets and property types. The investor moves from a single concentrated position to broad diversification without a taxable event.

721 UPREIT Creates

Future Liquidity Optionality

OP units can typically be converted to REIT shares after a defined holding period—usually 1 to 3 years—introducing a liquidity path where none previously existed. The investor controls the timing and therefore the timing of gain recognition.

"In many cases, DSTs and 721 strategies are used together—creating a deliberate transition from active concentrated ownership to a diversified, passive, institutionally managed structure. This is not a product recommendation. It is a capital architecture decision."

— Jimmy Goolsby, President, Paragon Wealth Counselors

Real Estate Capital Event · 1031 / DST / Private RE / 721 UPREIT

$9.1 Million Exit. Zero Capital Gains. Transformed Structure.

A Southeast real estate investor sought to exit a single concentrated, operationally demanding property—approximately $7.6 million in equity and $1.5 million in existing debt. The objective was not simply tax deferral. It was to improve income, eliminate the management burden, diversify into multiple asset types, and create long-term structural flexibility.

Rather than executing a traditional one-for-one exchange into a single replacement property, the capital was restructured across multiple components within the IRS identification and closing windows:

DST Allocation

6 Properties

Diversified across six institutional-quality DST holdings—passive income engine generating approximately $176,000 annually at ~4.7% yield on equity, with non-recourse debt satisfying replacement requirements

Private Real Estate

~$3.85M

Two strategic private market RE positions—one income-producing, one growth-oriented—providing blended yield with reduced leverage and appreciation potential alongside the DST income engine

721 UPREIT Position

~$1.7M

Positioned for potential REIT conversion within a 2–3 year window—carryover basis preserved, timing of future gain recognition controlled by the client, future liquidity path introduced where none previously existed

$0

Capital gains recognized at time of sale

$176K

Annual passive income from DST portfolio alone

1 → 9+

Single concentrated asset into diversified institutional holdings

Active → Passive

Management burden eliminated entirely

Illustrative of an actual client engagement. Individual results will vary. Past results are not indicative of future performance. DSTs, 721 structures, and private RE investments are available to accredited investors only and involve significant risk including illiquidity.

Investment Platform & Due Diligence

Every DST Offering Has Cleared Institutional-Grade Screening

Every DST offering deployed within a Paragon exchange has cleared a rigorous multi-layer institutional due diligence process. This includes independent third-party operational reviews, offering-level analysis of fees, financing structure, sponsor assumptions, and property fundamentals—including appraisals, condition reports, and environmental assessments—and final approval by a standing investment committee.

Investors are not selecting from an open market of unvetted products. They are accessing a screened platform built specifically to protect accredited investors navigating major capital events—one where every offering has earned its place through a process that most investors never see but every investor deserves.

“If you’re approaching a sale or already under contract, the conversation needs to happen before closing—not after.”

02

Non-RE Capital Gains Events

Qualified Opportunity Zones

For business owners selling a company, the capital gains exposure can be the largest single tax event of their financial lives. For real estate investors whose exchange window has already closed, the tax clock is running—and the 1031 option is gone. For any accredited investor with significant non-real estate capital gains, conventional reinvestment options offer little relief. Qualified Opportunity Zones exist precisely at this intersection—providing a gain-only reinvestment structure that defers the original tax and potentially eliminates capital gains on everything that grows inside the fund.

Key structural advantage

“Unlike a 1031 exchange, a QOZ investment requires only the gain portion to be reinvested—not the full proceeds. The cost basis is not subject to the reinvestment requirement and is returned to the investor immediately.”

$1.15M

Actual client gain deferred across three separate QOZ funds after busted exchange

3 Funds

Gain diversified across three QOZ funds—different strategies and geographies

Basis kept

Client retained cost basis proceeds outright—not subject to QOZ reinvestment requirement

10 yrs

Holding period after which fund appreciation is potentially excluded from capital gains

Technical Definition—For CPAs and Legal Professionals

Qualified Opportunity Zone funds (IRC Sections 1400Z-1 and 1400Z-2) allow a taxpayer who realizes a capital gain—from any source—to defer that gain by investing the gain amount only (not full proceeds) into a QOZ fund within 180 days of recognition. If held for at least 10 years, all appreciation inside the fund is excluded from federal capital gains taxation entirely upon a qualifying sale.

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), signed July 4, 2025, made the program permanent. Under OZ 2.0, investments made on or after January 1, 2027 carry a rolling five-year deferral from the investment date and a 10% basis step-up after five years. Investments made before January 1, 2027 under original TCJA rules recognize the deferred gain on December 31, 2026—making near-term investment timing a critical planning consideration.

Unlike a 1031 exchange, there is no like-kind requirement, no identification window, and no requirement to reinvest full proceeds—only the gain. QOZ funds apply to business sales, equity events, and situations where a 1031 window has already closed. IRS guidance on OZ 2.0 is anticipated before the January 1, 2027 effective date—the planning conversation needs to happen now.

How QOZ Works—and Where It's Different from a 1031

A Qualified Opportunity Zone Fund (QOZF) is a structured vehicle that deploys capital into designated economic development zones—typically real estate development, operating businesses, or a combination. Investors who recognize a capital gain and reinvest that gain into a QOZF within 180 days receive deferral on the original gain and—if held for the required period—potential exclusion of all appreciation inside the fund from capital gains taxation.

Feature
What must be reinvested
Asset type requirement
Reinvestment flexibility
When available
Tax on original gain
Tax on fund appreciation
Liquidity
1031 Exchange
Full proceeds (equity + debt)
Like-kind real estate only
Must replace with qualifying RE
Must identify within 45 days, close within 180
Deferred until sale of replacement
Deferred at 1031 rate
Dependent on property type
Qualified Opportunity Zone
Gain portion only—cost basis not subject to reinvestment requirement, returned to investor immediately
Any capital gain—RE, business sale, equities, art
Can deploy into RE development, operating businesses, diversified funds
180-day window from gain recognition—includes busted exchanges
Deferred (current rules—monitor legislative updates)
Potentially excluded from capital gains after required 10-year holding period, subject to fund compliance and applicable law
Typically illiquid for holding period—development risk applies

The Business Sale—The Largest Capital Gains Event Most Owners Will Ever Face

A business sale is categorically different from a real estate exit. For a business owner who has spent decades building equity, the sale event can generate capital gains that consume 30–40% or more of the total proceeds in a single tax year—one of the largest single tax events most owners will ever face. Federal long-term capital gains, state income tax, and net investment income tax combine in ways that most owners don’t fully calculate until the closing statement arrives.

Qualified Opportunity Zone funds were specifically designed for exactly this situation. Only the gain portion of the sale needs to be reinvested—not the full proceeds. The seller keeps their cost basis entirely, in hand, immediately available. The capital gain is deferred by deploying it into a QOZ fund within 180 days of the sale date. And if the investment is held for the required period, all appreciation generated inside the fund is potentially excluded from capital gains taxation entirely—meaning the deferred gain compounds in a structure where the exit is tax-advantaged.

What Must Be Reinvested

Gain only

Cost basis returned to seller immediately—no reinvestment required on basis proceeds

Investment Window

180 days

From date of sale—the conversation must happen before the transaction closes, not after

Tax on Fund Appreciation

Potentially $0

All appreciation inside the fund potentially excluded from capital gains after required holding period

The business sale is also where diversification across multiple QOZ funds becomes particularly valuable. Rather than concentrating the entire deferred gain in a single fund and a single development project, the gain can be deployed across multiple funds—different geographies, different asset types, different development timelines—reducing concentration risk while preserving the full tax benefit. This is not a standard brokerage account solution. It requires access to a curated platform of vetted QOZ fund offerings and the expertise to match the right structures to the client’s gain profile, timeline, and tax situation.

The Busted Exchange Recovery—When the 1031 Window Closes, a QOZ Fund Can Step In

When a 1031 exchange identification window closes without a suitable replacement property—a scenario more common than most investors expect—the 1031 option is gone. There is no like-kind replacement available. The conventional response is to recognize the gain, pay the tax, and move forward. But the QOZ 180-day investment window is a separate clock—and it may still be open. A missed 1031 deadline does not have to mean a taxable event.

The QOZ rules do not require like-kind reinvestment, do not require reinvestment of the full proceeds—only the gain—and apply to any recognized capital gain, including one arising from a failed 1031 exchange. This means a missed 45-day deadline, rather than triggering an immediate tax event, can become the entry point for a QOZ structure with potentially superior long-term tax economics.

Real-World Case Study · Busted Exchange Recovery · Multi-Fund QOZ Deployment

The 45-Day Window Closed. The Client Kept Their Basis and Deferred the Gain.

A client came to us after the 45-day identification window on a 1031 exchange had expired without a suitable replacement property identified. The conventional outcome: recognize the full capital gain and pay the tax. Our outcome was different.

The client’s sale generated $1,150,000 in capital gain. The cost basis—the portion of proceeds above that gain—was not subject to the QOZ reinvestment requirement. The client retained it outright and immediately available. Only the gain required reinvestment.

The $1,150,000 gain was then strategically divided across three separate QOZ funds—providing diversification across different development strategies, geographies, and risk profiles. Each fund began its appreciation clock independently. A missed deadline became a superior long-term structure.

Client Retained—Tax Free

Basis Kept

Cost basis portion of the sale proceeds not subject to QOZ reinvestment requirement—returned to client immediately, available for other uses

Gain Invested Across

3 QOZ Funds

$1,150,000 divided across three funds—different strategies, geographies, and development profiles—QOZ-level diversification not available in a single fund deployment

Tax on Appreciation

Potentially $0

All appreciation generated inside each fund is excluded from capital gains if held through the required 10-year period—the missed deadline became a long-term compounding vehicle

Illustrative of an actual client engagement. QOZ investments involve significant risk, illiquidity, and development risk. Available to accredited investors only. The investor’s basis proceeds were not subject to QOZ reinvestment requirements. Tax outcomes depend on holding period, fund structure, and applicable law. Consult a qualified tax professional. Legislative proposals regarding QOZ rules are monitored but not yet enacted.

“If the 1031 window has closed, the conversation is not over. The QOZ window may still be open.”

03

Daily Liquid AUM

Evidence-Based Liquid Portfolio

After tax strategy and capital structure have been addressed, the daily liquid portfolio is where the Paragon approach diverges most sharply from conventional wealth management. It is built around a single, evidence-backed insight: long-term market wealth flows from a tiny fraction of companies, and no one reliably identifies them in advance. The response to that reality is structural, not predictive.

The academic foundation

“The best-performing 4% of listed companies explain the entire net gain of the U.S. stock market since 1926—the other 96% collectively matched Treasury bills.”

~58%

Of all stocks ever traded destroyed rather than created shareholder wealth³

4%

Of U.S. stocks created all net wealth above T-bills—1926 to 2016²

46 firms

Account for half of all $91T U.S. wealth created over 100 years⁵

2.4%

Of global firms created all $75.7T in net global wealth—1990 to 2020⁴

The Bessembinder Insight—Why Structure Beats Selection

Professor Hendrik Bessembinder spent decades analyzing the lifetime returns of every publicly traded stock in the U.S.—nearly 30,000 companies—from 1926 through 2025. His findings are striking and practically important: the majority of stocks fail to outperform Treasury bills over their lifetimes, and the entire net wealth created by the stock market flows from a tiny fraction of companies.² The problem is that no one reliably identifies those companies in advance.

This is not an argument against equity ownership. It is an argument against the premise that stock selection or active manager selection adds value over time. The SPIVA data reinforces the academic finding: over 20-year periods, more than 94% of active domestic funds underperform their benchmarks after fees.¹ The rational response is not to abandon equity markets—it is to own them in a way that is structurally designed to capture that return—broad market participation without relying on selection.

$91T

Total U.S. stock market wealth created 1926–2025—generated by fewer than 4% of all companies listed in that period⁵

−6.9%

Median stock return over the full century—the typical stock destroyed wealth while the index compounded dramatically⁵

51%

Average drawdown for top-200 decade performers in the prior decade—extreme patience required even for eventual long-run winners²

The Academic Foundation—Two Converging Bodies of Research

Two independent bodies of research—one on where long-term market wealth is created, one on what taxes do to it once it arrives—converge on the same conclusion for a taxable investor.

Bessembinder (2018–2026)—Where the wealth comes from

A century of data across nearly 30,000 U.S. listed companies shows that all net stock market wealth flows from fewer than 4% of companies.² The other 96% collectively matched Treasury bills. The median stock had a negative lifetime return.⁵ Wealth is created by a small minority of companies that compound over decades—and nobody reliably identifies them in advance.

The implication: structure and broad ownership, not selection.

Ang (2026)—What taxes take from it

A century of simulation through the actual federal tax code finds that taxes consume an average of 347 basis points annually from a taxable equity investor’s returns—turning a ~10.5% pretax return into approximately 7.0% after tax. Over 30 years, that gap represents the largest single cost a taxable investor will bear.⁶

The implication: after-tax return is the only return that matters—and capturing it requires institutional tax management, not just market exposure.

The first finding requires structure. The second requires discipline. The Paragon liquid portfolio is built around both.

Three Governing Principles—Structure, Tax Management, and Behavioral Discipline

The Bessembinder research points to a specific construction imperative: the goal is not to identify which companies will create wealth—it is to ensure the portfolio is structured broadly enough to participate when they do, managed efficiently enough to preserve what it captures, and disciplined enough to stay invested through the volatility that precedes the most significant long-run returns. Those three imperatives govern every construction and implementation decision. The specific vehicles—whether direct indexes, ETFs, or a combination—are implementation choices made for each client based on account type, tax situation, and individual circumstances. The principles are constant. The execution is tailored.

Principle One

Broad Market Structure

The portfolio is built to capture the full breadth of where wealth creators can emerge—domestic large-cap, mid-cap, and international markets. Cap-weighted construction is deliberate: it allows winners to grow their weight naturally over time rather than systematically selling them through calendar rebalancing. The Bessembinder data confirms that wealth creators compound over decades—the portfolio must be structured to hold them, not trade them.

Small-cap is deliberately excluded. Bessembinder’s data shows the median small-cap stock has a negative lifetime return, and survivorship bias in small-cap indexes overstates historical performance by removing the failures. The behavioral demands of holding through small-cap volatility also work directly against the long-term compounding discipline the framework requires.

Domestic large-cap and mid-cap coverage


Broad international coverage—developed and emerging


Cap-weighting lets winners run naturally


Small-cap excluded—evidence-based, not arbitrary

Principle Two

Institutional Tax Management

The after-tax return is the only return that matters. Where account type and client circumstances support it, direct indexing—holding individual securities in a separately managed account rather than a pooled fund—enables tax-loss harvesting at the individual security level. This capability extends to international positions where applicable. Concentrated stock positions, restricted stock, and charitable gifting strategies are integrated within the same structure.

This is executed through an institutional direct indexing platform—not replicable through a retail brokerage account. The tax management is systematic, continuous, and managed by a dedicated professional team. It is one of the most meaningful differences between a properly structured HNW portfolio and a self-directed one.

Stock-level harvesting in domestic and international sleeves


Institutional platform—systematic and continuous


Concentrated position and restricted stock integration


Charitable gifting of appreciated individual positions

Principle Three

Behavioral Discipline and Rebalancing

Bessembinder’s data shows that even the greatest long-run wealth creators experienced average drawdowns of 51% in the decade before their best decade.² The chief enemy of long-run returns is not market performance—it is investor behavior during the inevitable periods of decline that test conviction and invite abandonment of the strategy at exactly the wrong moment.

Rebalancing is managed systematically, guided by portfolio drift, tax conditions, and individual client circumstances—not by fixed calendar dates or rigid percentage thresholds that can override professional judgment. New capital is directed first to underweight areas to minimize taxable events. The framework is designed to let the long-run compounding thesis work—which requires staying invested through the periods that make staying invested difficult.

Drift-based rebalancing—tax-aware and circumstance-sensitive


New contributions directed to underweight areas first


Behavioral coaching through drawdown periods


Professional judgment—not mechanical rules—governs execution

"The question is not whether a client could hold the same indexes in a retail account. The question is whether they have the tax infrastructure, the institutional platform, and the behavioral discipline to capture the return those indexes can deliver over a full market cycle. That is what this framework is built to provide."

Academic Sources

¹ S&P Dow Jones Indices. SPIVA U.S. Scorecard. 20-year data through December 2024. Over 20-year periods, 94.1% of active domestic funds underperformed the S&P Composite 1500.

² Bessembinder, H. “Do Stocks Outperform Treasury Bills?” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 129, Issue 3, pp. 440–460. 2018. Arizona State University. Documents that 4.3% of U.S. stocks accounted for all net wealth creation above Treasury bills from 1926–2016.

³ Bessembinder, H. “Wealth Creation in U.S. Public Stock Markets 1926–2019.” Journal of Investing, 2021. Extends dollar-denominated wealth accounting; finds 57.8% of stocks destroyed wealth while the market created $47.4 trillion net.

⁴ Bessembinder, H., Chen, T., Choi, G., & Wei, K.C.J. “Long-Term Shareholder Returns: Evidence from 64,000 Global Stocks.” Financial Analysts Journal, 2023. Global extension covering 1990–2020; finds 2.4% of firms created all $75.7 trillion in net global wealth.

⁵ Bessembinder, H. “One Hundred Years in the U.S. Stock Markets.” SSRN Working Paper, 2026. Full century analysis of 29,754 stocks; median return −6.9%; $91 trillion created by fewer than 4% of listed companies; 46 firms account for half of all net wealth.

⁶ Ang, A. “Uncle Sam’s Cut: A Century of the Federal Tax Drag on U.S. Equity Investors.” SSRN Working Paper, May 2026. Columbia Business School. Simulates a taxable investor holding the U.S. equity market through the actual federal tax code from 1926–2025; finds an average annual federal tax drag of 347 basis points across eight overlapping 30-year windows. Note: federal tax only—state and local taxes increase the measured drag for most investors.

“Structure, tax management, and behavioral discipline. Three things a retail account cannot provide. Three things this framework is built around.”

04

Private Capital & Insurance

Non-Correlated & Tax-Advantaged Compounding

The final layer of the Paragon architecture is where genuine non-correlation, institutional tax characteristics, and long-term accumulation converge. Private investment structures—Reg D offerings, interval funds, and select alternative vehicles—provide return streams, income characteristics, and in certain situations, tax deductibility that public markets simply cannot replicate. This pillar begins with access—to private capital structures that most advisors neither offer nor fully understand. But access alone is not the differentiator. The differentiator is how these structures are deployed: deliberately, selectively, and as an integrated component of a complete capital architecture built around the client’s specific tax situation, income needs, and long-term objectives.

The bond replacement thesis

“Stocks and bonds have historically moved in opposite directions—providing balance precisely when it was needed. But in periods of genuine market stress, that relationship can break down, with both declining together at exactly the moment diversification matters most.”

Reg D

Private placements for accredited investors—non-correlated return streams, with income that may be tax-deferred, tax-advantaged, or in certain structures, a potential reducer of current taxable income

Interval

Interval funds provide periodic liquidity windows with institutional-quality private market exposure

After-tax in

High cash value insurance funded with after-tax dollars—structured for maximum accumulation, minimum death benefit

Tax-advantaged out

Policy loans generally not treated as taxable income when the policy remains in force—tax-advantaged access to accumulated cash value

Private Investments—Genuine Diversification, Intentional Integration

Private investments are not added to the portfolio for access or complexity. They are added to solve a specific problem: providing genuine diversification when public market correlations converge, and generating return streams that public structures cannot replicate. Many private investments also carry tax characteristics unavailable in public markets—income that is tax-deferred, income that may be tax-advantaged, and in certain structures, the potential to reduce taxable income in the year of investment. These characteristics are evaluated individually and deployed where they fit a client’s specific tax picture.

Where investors often go wrong is not in the investments themselves—it is in accumulating disconnected private positions over time with overlapping risk, misaligned liquidity, and no integration with the broader capital structure. The Paragon approach deploys private capital selectively and intentionally, with a clear view of how each position complements the liquid portfolio and fits within the overall tax picture.

Regulation D Offerings

Private Placements—Non-Correlation and Tax Characteristics

The defining advantage of Reg D private placements is twofold. First, genuine non-correlation—these investments are not priced daily, do not respond to public market sentiment, and generate return streams that behave independently of what equities and bonds do. In a portfolio context, that independence has real value that daily liquid securities cannot replicate regardless of how they are labeled.

Second, tax characteristics that public market investments simply do not carry. Depending on the structure, private placements can generate income that is tax-deferred, distributions that are tax-advantaged, and in certain strategies—particularly within energy-related and specific real asset structures—deductions that reduce taxable income in the year capital is deployed. For a high-income accredited investor facing a significant tax liability, this is not a planning strategy. It is an investment category with characteristics built specifically for that situation. These vary by offering and must always be evaluated in the context of each client’s full tax picture with their CPA.

Private real estate—multifamily, industrial, development


Private credit and selective private equity


Energy-related and real asset structures with tax characteristics


Current-year deductibility in certain qualifying structures


Tax-deferred and tax-advantaged income streams

Interval Funds

Periodic Liquidity Access

Interval funds provide quarterly or semi-annual liquidity windows while holding institutional-quality private market assets. They sit between the illiquidity of Reg D offerings and the daily liquidity of ETFs—making them appropriate for capital that doesn’t need immediate access but benefits from the return premium of private markets. They register as investment companies and carry regulatory oversight absent in many Reg D structures.

Integration Principle

How Private Fits the Architecture

Private positions are sized relative to the client’s liquidity needs, time horizon, and tax situation. They are not accumulated independently of the broader portfolio—they are deliberate components within it. The objective is not access to opportunities. It is how those investments reduce correlation, generate income, and improve after-tax outcomes as part of the whole.

Tax-Advantaged Insurance Structures—A Supporting Role

Institutional-Grade Life Insurance

Tax-Advantaged Accumulation and Income

For clients who have maximized conventional tax-advantaged vehicles and are looking for additional after-tax accumulation capacity, institutional-grade high cash value life insurance structures serve a specific and defined role within the overall capital architecture. Engineered for maximum cash value accumulation with a minimum required death benefit, these policies allow after-tax dollars to grow on a tax-deferred basis—with access to accumulated value through policy loans generally not treated as taxable income when the policy remains in force. This is one tool within the broader architecture—deployed selectively where it genuinely fits, not as a default recommendation.

After-tax funding — tax-deferred accumulation throughout


Policy loans generally not treated as taxable income


Structured for accumulation — not mortality coverage


Deployed selectively where it fits the client’s full picture

Investment Platform & Due Diligence—DAI Securities

A Best-in-Class Screening Process Behind Every Private Investment

Access to private investments is only the beginning. Every offering deployed within the Paragon framework has cleared an institutional due diligence process built around the Four P’s—People, Philosophy, Process, and Performance. This framework evaluates not just what an investment is, but the individuals behind it, the discipline of their approach, the rigor of their execution, and the sustainability of their results.

At the sponsor level, this means a thorough review of organizational background, ownership structure, management team experience, track record, compliance history, and alignment between manager and investor. At the offering level, it means analysis of fees, financing structure, pro forma assumptions, third-party property assessments, appraisals, environmental reports, and tax opinions—reviewed against independent third-party due diligence firm reports.

Every approved offering passes through a standing investment committee whose members collectively bring over 100 years of financial services experience with deep specialization in real estate and alternative investments. The committee meets weekly. Approval is not automatic—it is earned.

Approved offerings are monitored on an ongoing basis—sponsor financial statements, performance compared to original projections, legal and regulatory updates, and management changes are tracked continuously. The due diligence does not end at approval. It continues for the life of the investment. The goal is not access to alternatives. It is access to alternatives that have earned their place on a best-in-class platform.

"The private investment category is where the most consequential tax characteristics live—non-correlation that holds when markets converge, income structures unavailable in public markets, and in the right situations, the ability to reduce taxable income in the year it is created. These are not add-ons. For the right accredited investor, they are the foundation of a genuinely complete capital architecture."

— Jimmy Goolsby, President, Paragon Wealth Counselors

“The most consequential capital decisions happen once. Getting the structure right—and the platform behind it—is what this practice is built for.”

Every major capital event has a window—for the right tax structure and the right capital deployment.
Let’s talk before yours closes.

Whether you’re a CPA, attorney, or commercial broker with a client referral, or an investor navigating a major liquidity event, the conversation should happen before the deadline—not after it.

South Office · Primary

62 Macon Street, Suite 8
McDonough, GA 30253

North Office · Atlanta

3495 Piedmont Road NE
Building 10, Suite 115
Atlanta, GA 30305

Prefer to reach out directly?